Your local pickleball courts are undoubtedly a place — a sandbox if you will — where new techniques are tested, strategies devised and where rule interpretations are discussed, argued and eventually conceded. We recently had a such a discussion about momentum and the non-volley zone (NVZ). Specifically, consider the following scenario: Your opponent hits a shot that bounces beyond the non-volley zone (kitchen). You respond with a ground stroke but your momentum from the shot carries you into the non-volley zone. Is this a fault?
One camp argued that, regardless of where the ball bounces on the court — as long as it bounces — your momentum from hitting your groundstroke can, indeed, carry you into the NVZ without penalty. The other camp countered that if the ball bounces beyond the NVZ your momentum cannot take you into the NVZ without a fault being called.
Pickleball Momentum Rule — Let’s Go to the Rulebook
Rule 9.B. states from the International Federation of Pickleball Official Tournament Handbook states the following with respect to momentum:
A fault will be declared if, in the act of volleying the ball, a player or anything the player is wearing or carrying touches the non-volley zone or touches any non-volley line… The act of volleying the ball includes the swing, the follow-through, and the momentum from the action.
After reading this rule, it is clear that this rule applies only to the act of volleying the ball — hitting the ball out of the air before it bounces. It does not apply to a groundstroke — or a ball that bounces first.
USAPA “Official” Twitter Clarification
To get “official” clarification, I tweeted the question to our friends at the USAPA. Shown below is their response along with an additional response from Third Shot Sports.
@PickleballUSA If ur opponent hits a shot landing beyond NVZ & you hit groundstroke, but momentum carries u into NVZ… Fault? What say you?
— PickleballMAX (@pickleballmax) September 14, 2015
@pickleballmax As long as you are letting it bounce, you can go into the non-volley zone. Good question!
— Pickleball USA (@PickleballUSA) September 14, 2015
No problem at all. Going into the kitchen after a groundie is a-ok! #pickleball https://t.co/1lplXlq1xV
— Third Shot Sports (@thirdshotsports) September 14, 2015
Hopefully this makes sense to all. At least it’s one less thing we all have to worry about as we approach the kitchen. Please subscribe to our newsletter so that you receive pickleball rule updates/interpretations, as well as pickleball tips, strategies, tournament recaps and more.
See you on the courts!
I’m still confused about this rule and I think I’m not the only one? Lol-Maybe I need a visual at the courts to help me understand 🙂
Still unclear about momentum and the volley outside the NVZ. at which time does the moemntum stop being a factor. it you hit the volley, it crosses the net is a winner, unreturnable, and then your momentum causes you to enter the NVZ is that still a fault. Point being if the point is ended and your momentum continues into the NVZ do you still lose the point? Seems like once the point is over, regardless how it concludes that if you then enter the NVZ it should still be your point.
Hi Mike,
That’s a good question. Indeed, you do lose the point if the point is ended and your momentum carries you into the NVZ. Check out the FAQs here: https://www.pickleballmax.com/2015/09/pickleball-faqs-volleys-groundies-and-the-non-volley-zone/. Specifically, the Q&A pertaining to this is as follows:
QUESTION: Can the momentum from your volley carry you into the Non-Volley Zone subsequent to the ball bouncing twice on your opponent’s side?
ANSWER: Your momentum cannot carry you into the kitchen even after the ball is dead (or in this case, bounced twice).
See you on the courts!
Question:
You answered a lot but I have one that I can’t find an answer for:
You volley a ball outside the kitchen, you’re teetering at the line but BEFORE you step in the ball is struck/returned by your opponent, you Then step in the kitchen, I believe this negates the follow through violation since the prior hit (my volley) ends when the ball is struck again. Can you clarify this for me ?
Thanks !
Hi Kris, Good question. The momentum from your volley is NOT negated when your opponent hits the next shot. If you fell into the kitchen because of the momentum from your [previous] volley, it would still be a fault. Hope that helps to clarify.
How about when you volley a distance from the NVZ, but you were running toward the ball to execute the volley. You continue forward several more steps (3+, for instance), and step into the kitchen. My opponent says it was my volley momentum that carried me into the kitchen. I say the act of continuing to move forward is not momentum, just the first step after striking volley. What say you?
Hi Landy,
In this case, I would likely side with your opponent. If it is your momentum that takes you into the NVZ (regardless of the number of steps it took), it would, indeed, be a fault. Since after hitting a volley, you would have no reason to enter the NVZ (unless your opponent blocked your volley just over the net), I would assume it’s your momentum that took you in… therefore a fault.
Hope this helps!
Todd
What is the rule for returning a volley in the air in the NVZ (I jumped up) but landed beyond the NVZ line?
That would be fault. According to Rule #9.D: “All volleys must be initiated outside of the non-volley zone. A maneuver such as standing within the non-volley zone, jumping up to hit a volley, and then landing outside the nonvolley zone is prohibited. If a player has touched the non-volley zone for any reason, that player cannot volley the return until both feet have made contact with the playing surface completely outside the non-volley zone. (Revised June 23, 2012)”
Is the non-volley zone two dimensional, which is the court surface from & including the non-volley line to the net and the two side lines (making a rectangle)?
Hi James, Good question. The non-volley zone is, indeed, two-dimensional with the shape you describe — not three-dimensional! Hope this helps!
Still a bit unsure about this rule. When would my volley be considered complete and I could enter the kitchen?
The volley is considered complete when you no longer have forward momentum from the act of volleying. There is no time limit. For example, you could be “teetering” on the line for 20 seconds — if you subsequently fall into the NVZ (from a volley) it would be a fault. This would even be the case if the ball has been played back and forth or if the ball has bounced twice on the other side, for example. The momentum has no time limit and it would result in a fault. Hope that helps!
While returning a shot, the ball strikes my hand. Is this a fault or a good return?
Hi Vinnie,
It depends on where the ball hit you. Rule #7.G. addresses your question:
Hope that helps.
What if the ball bounce outside of the non volley zone, and you run up and hit the ball and the momentum take you in the kitchen is that a fault
Hi Clint, Because the ball bounced first, you’re a-ok. No fault.
What if you dropped your paddle and return the ball with your hand. Is that a fault?
Hi Jim, Yes, that would be considered a fault.
What if I hit a ball in air while running to net, then ball is returned in nvz and bounces at same time I enter nvz, then I return ball over net?
Hi Calmike, The “momentum” from the volley has no “time-limit.” In this case, because your momentum from your original volley took you into the NVZ, it would be a fault on you. If, on the other hand, you had firmly established your position/balance outside the NVZ, then you could safely enter to return the short ball. Hope this helps.
Valuable information! Your answers are clear and succinct! I’m glad I joined.