You Make the Call!
Here’s the Scenario:
You attempt a volley. However, the ball hits you just above the wrist while you’re holding the paddle. The ball goes in. Your opponents stop playing and claim they win the rally because you didn’t hit the ball with your paddle. What’s the call?
Luckily, this scenario is explicitly addressed in Rule #7.G of the International Federation of Pickleball Official Tournament Rulebook. In the above scenario, you were hit above the wrist on your paddle hand. Because you were hit above the wrist — and not below the wrist — a fault should be declared. Unfortunately for you, in this case, your opponents were correct.
Likewise, had the pickleball had hit you in any place other than below your wrist on your paddle hand, a fault should be declared — even if the ball goes back over the net and into the opponent’s court from being hit. Let’s look at the official rule applicable to this scenario.
International Federation of Pickleball — Official Tournament Rulebook
Rule #7.G:
[A fault will be declared if…] The ball in play strikes a player or anything the player is wearing or carrying, except the paddle or the player’s paddle hand below the wrist….
Need More Pickleball Rules Clarifications & Interpretations?
Please reference our pickleball rules page and make sure to subscribe to our newsletter so that you receive additional pickleball rules clarifications and interpretations for many of the common — and not-so-common — scenarios that happen on the pickleball courts. By subscribing to the newsletter you will also receive pickleball tips, strategies, tournament recaps and more.
I have 2 questions that have come up in play regarding the non volley zone:
1) opponent hits the ball to me and I hit a volley back to her partner who hits it out. I did not enter the NVZ prior to him hitting it to him, but I did walk through the corner of the NVZ after he hit the ball out. A fault was called on me. Seems to me that since both of my feet were outside the NVZ when I hit it to him and my “momentum” — even though my walking through it was not part of the hit — took place after he hit the ball out that a fault should not be called.
2) opponent hits ball toward sideline near NVZ. I jump over the NVZ and hit ball around the post. I did not touch NVZ nor the right hand line. A fault was called since opponent thought the NVZ extended past the right and left lines. Told them the NVZ stopped at the right and left line and it was not a fault.
What are your interpretations of these two situations?
Thanks very much.
Hi Robert, I agree with your opponent on #1. Any momentum from a volley (regardless if it occurred before or after your opponent hit it out) would result in a fault. As for #2, you are absolutely correct. The NVZ is 2-dimensional and stops at the right and left sideline. Jumping over the corner of the NVZ would not result in a fault. Hope that helps.